Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy F41, even though they were released only 1 months apart. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should count with all the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a processor that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy F41 one, they have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy F41 shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.