Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's 85.2 general score. Google Pixel 5's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F41, even when they were released only 0 months apart. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a little larger screen. Galaxy F41 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.