Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F41 has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy F41's construction is notably newer and a little bit thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F41, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor. HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels in each display inch.
Galaxy F41 counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.