Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is better than LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy F41's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a lot brighter screen and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG G7 Fit counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy F41 takes much better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light environments, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.