Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Titan gray |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F41's score of 85.2. LG K92's design is just a little thinner but a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy F41, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit better performance than LG K92. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy F41 captures clearer pictures and videos than LG K92, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy F41 also has a larger camera sensor. LG K92 features a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy F41 has a much better battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.