Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy F41's general score of 85.2. LG V60 ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy F41, but it's heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Galaxy F41 takes better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have a 64 mega pixels camera, the same video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size camera sensor. The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F41 has improved battery life than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.