Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy F41's general score of 85.2. LG Velvet is a a bit lighter and thinner phone than Galaxy F41, even though both were released only 5 months apart. The LG Velvet's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy F41, both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.