Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Mineral Gray |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022), with a overall score of 85.2 against 84.7. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F41 is an older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Edge (2022).
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The Motorola Edge (2022) features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F41. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy F41 captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy F41 has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 features superior battery performance than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.