Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 85.2 score against 83.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Galaxy F41's body is just a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it's a bit thicker and was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy F41 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen, a much brighter display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy F41 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.