Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 85.2 score against 81.9. Galaxy F41 is a noticeably older, a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly better 1256 x 2760 resolution, a little bit greater screen pixels density and a much brighter display. Galaxy F41 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 features a way better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.