Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F41, having a overall score of 86.3 against 85.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11, providing you lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is newer, a little thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F41.
Galaxy F41 has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit larger display and way more brightness.
Galaxy F41 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality and a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Galaxy F41 has better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.