Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy F41, getting an 87.1 score against 85.2. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy F41 has Android 11, providing the user lots of additional features. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a little heavier than Galaxy F41, it's a little thinner and notably newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with way more screen brightness, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy F41 features better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Galaxy F41, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.