Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is a bit better than Moto G 5G, having an 85.2 score against 81.5. Galaxy F41 is a a little bit lighter and thinner device than the Moto G 5G, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy F41 has a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy F41 features a better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto G 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with greater battery duration than Moto G 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.