Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting a general score of 85.2 against 82.6. The Galaxy F41 body has the same thickness than the Moto G 5G Plus, but it's just a little bit lighter. The Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy F41 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy F41 has greater battery life than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.