Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy F41, getting a general score of 86.2 against 85.2. The Motorola Moto G200 5G construction has the same thickness than Galaxy F41, but it is a little heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy F41 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Galaxy F41 takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way lower 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.