Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a a bit lighter and a little thinner phone than Moto G60s. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy F41 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Moto G60s counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a slightly better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy F41 features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G60s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.