Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. Even when the Samsung Galaxy F41 and the Moto G9 Play were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little thinner and a little lighter. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 features a better looking display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy F41 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Moto G9 Play counts with as much memory to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy F41, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has longer battery lifetime than Moto G9 Play, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.