Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than the Moto Z Force, with a score of 85.2 against 75.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy F41's construction is way newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Force.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy F41 features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Moto Z Force counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 71 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F41 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.