Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. The Galaxy F41 body is way newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and Galaxy F41 both count with very similar processing units, and although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.