Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is better than Moto Z2 Play, getting a global score of 85.2 against 77.4. Galaxy F41's design is way newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it is heavier and way thicker. Galaxy F41 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy F41 captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 100 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.