Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F41 is newer than the Moto Z3, it is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier.
Moto Z3 counts with a processor that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy F41's processor, and although the Moto Z3 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a quite higher number of pixels in each inch of display, a little larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Moto Z3 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy F41 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy F41 captures way better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy F41 also has a bigger aperture, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.