Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. The Galaxy F41 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, but it's thicker and heavier. The Galaxy F41 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit bigger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F41 features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 100 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.