Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a overall score of 85.2 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy F41 design has the same thickness than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is just a little bit lighter. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide very similar operating system features.
Galaxy F41 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Motorola One Hyper features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same video definition, a 64 MP camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.