Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a bit better than Galaxy F41's 85.2 general score. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the user very similar operating system features. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) and Galaxy F41 were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) construction is somewhat thinner but just a bit heavier than Galaxy F41.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little higher pixels density, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.