Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is slightly better than Motorola razr (2022), with an 85.2 score against 81.1. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. Even though Samsung Galaxy F41 is older and thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's body is still a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola razr (2022) has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy F41 features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.