Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 403 pixels per inch | -- |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a global score of 85.2 against 79.2. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen and way less brightness.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a really superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy F41 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh. The Galaxy F41 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also has a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.