Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy F41's body is newer, somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 has a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a just a little greater pixel count per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy F41 has a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has greater battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.