Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Even being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F41 is a heavier and somewhat thicker device than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and increased performance.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a little better processing power than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F41, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite larger display, a little bit higher screen pixel density and way more brightness.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy F41 has a much better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.