Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F41's score of 85.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F41, even though both were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F41. Both have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a same size aperture, a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F41 has longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.