Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy F41's 85.2 general score. Although the Galaxy Note 20 and the Galaxy F41 were only released 2 months apart, Galaxy Note 20's design is just a bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.