Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Galaxy F41's 85.2 global score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy F41 were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Galaxy F41.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Galaxy F41, because it has a little bit better display pixels density, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher 108 MP resolution camera and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.