Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F41, getting a score of 89 against 85.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older device than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy F41 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a just a bit greater screen density and a little larger display.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.