Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-16 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note8's 83 global score. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has older 11 version while Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy F41's body is extremely newer and a bit lighter than Galaxy Note8's, although it's a little thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy F41 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy F41, both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy F41 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has an 82% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy F41 takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.