Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the Galaxy F41, getting an 86.3 score against 85.2. Galaxy S10e is an older phone than Galaxy F41, but it's thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy F41 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy F41 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.