Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Galaxy F41, with a score of 98 against 85.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier device than Galaxy F41, but both are 0.35inches thick. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Galaxy F41 has Android 11, so it provides the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking display than Galaxy F41, because it has a better pixel quantity per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better video definition and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy F41 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.