Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy F41's 85.2 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but it is heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a lot brighter display, a little bit greater display density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a processing unit that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy F41 one, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy F41 has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 has improved battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way better 108 MP resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.