Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S9, getting a score of 85.2 against 83.3. Galaxy F41's construction is extremely newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy S9. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater pixels number in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F41, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy F41 has a better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.