Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 85.2 score against 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were released only a few months apart. These devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F41, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy F41 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy F41 one, they have equal 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.