Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. Even when Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy F41 were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and a little bit lighter. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little less pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy F41 features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much more MP back camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.