Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a general score of 85.2 against 82.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F41 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features. Galaxy F41 has the same weight and thickness than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F41. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy F41 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro have extremely similar screens, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little more brightness, they both have a better pixel amount per inch of screen, a same size screen and the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F41 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.