Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F41, having an 87.9 score against 85.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but they have the same thickness.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F41. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, way more brightness and a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have a same size back camera sensor and the same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy F41 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features superior battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.