Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy F41, with an 86.1 score against 85.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro construction is a little bit thinner but a bit heavier than Galaxy F41. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should count with very similar OS features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy F41. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a better 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a little larger display.
Galaxy F41 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy F41, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.