Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F41, with a 91.5 score against 85.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy F41, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a slightly better screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, much more brightness and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
The Galaxy F41 has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.