Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having a global score of 85.2 against 75.7. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also incredibly older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy F41 features a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite lower pixels count per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite bigger screen and way more brightness.
Galaxy F41 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Galaxy F41 counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.