Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's global score of 83.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy F41, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2710, a just a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a much brighter display.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.