Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 85.2 score against 81.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy F41 construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's just a bit lighter.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's CPU is very similar to the processor in Galaxy F41, both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy F41 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro have incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5020mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a camera that's just as good as the Galaxy F41 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rates, a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, a 64 MP resolution camera and the same (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.