Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a score of 85.2 against 79. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Samsung Galaxy F41's body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's a little lighter.
Galaxy F41 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy F41 has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F41 also has a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Galaxy F41 one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.