Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a 92.8 score against 88.1. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy F62 works with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 12 Pro is a a lot thinner and lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy F62, even when both of them were only released 4 months apart.
IPhone 12 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, a way brighter display and a just a little better amount of pixels per screen inch. IPhone 12 Pro has a superior CPU than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 12 Pro also has more processing cores and a 64-bits processor.
Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
The Galaxy F62 shoots better photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.