Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max is a bit better than the Galaxy F62, with a score of 93.2 against 88.1. IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy F62 counts with Android 11 OS. Although iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy F62 were released only a couple of months apart, the iPhone 12 Pro Max design is extremely thinner but a little bit heavier than Galaxy F62.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a 64 bits processing unit and a higher number of cores (and also faster). IPhone 12 Pro Max features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has much more brightness, a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy F62 takes better photographs and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.