Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy F62, having a overall score of 93.3 against 88.1. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a a little bit lighter and thinner device than Galaxy F62, even when both of them were only released 7 months apart. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy F62 has Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro features a better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a 64-bits CPU and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). IPhone 13 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density, way more brightness and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532.
Galaxy F62 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 126 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.